Newsletter
Investigative journalism award to Adrian Mogos
>> more
Assessment criteria
Each proposal will be assessed by the jurors on the basis of 10 criteria. For each criterion the juror will give a score of 0 (the proposal absolutely fails to meet the criterion) to 10 (the proposal fulfils the criterion completely). The criteria have a relative weight in relation to each other.
The end result is a score out of 1000. An average is taken from the scores that the 4 jurors award the proposal. A proposal that achieves an average of less than 600 out of 1000 will not be eligible for a work grant.
|
Criteria cross-border stories |
Relative weight |
|
Added value compared to mainstream coverage / a forgotten story |
16 |
|
Relevance in society |
12 |
|
Originality and innovative ideas |
10 |
|
Original and/or innovative research methods |
8 |
|
Feasibility |
10 |
|
Experience of the applicant/references |
4 |
|
Saleability / newsworthiness / publication in several countries |
11 |
|
Work effort requirement |
8 |
|
Cross border aspect |
11 |
|
Networking between colleagues in different countries, common research |
10 |
|
Total |
100 |
|
Criteria European affairs stories |
Relative weight |
|
Added value compared to mainstream coverage / a forgotten story |
16 |
|
Relevance in society |
12 |
|
Originality and innovative ideas |
8 |
|
Original and/or innovative research methods |
6 |
|
Feasibility |
10 |
|
Experience of the applicant/references |
4 |
|
Saleability / newsworthiness |
11 |
|
Work effort requirement |
7 |
|
Being a watchdog of the EU institutions |
15 |
|
Publication for an EU target group plus in one or preferably several European countries |
11 |
|
Total |
100 |