Illustration depicting a woman surrounded by hands and scissors
©Dariana Ilie

WARSAW / BUCHAREST - This cross-border investigation exposes the fast-growing aesthetic gynaecology market in Poland and Romania, an industry marketed as empowerment and “intimate wellness”, yet operating largely without scientific evidence, regulatory oversight, or meaningful patient protection.

Over several months, the team of investigative journalists employed a variety of methods, including undercover reporting, interviews with dozens of patients, analysis of medical records, audits of online advertising, and consultations with international experts in sexual medicine and pelvic neuroanatomy. They uncovered clinics that were making misleading claims and using unproven procedures and aggressive marketing designed to exploit women’s insecurities. Access to medical documentation was often obstructed; some clinics refused to release patient files or proof of payment despite having clear legal obligations to do so.

In both countries, surgeons openly admitted performing hundreds of labioplasties a year — including a significant numbers of revisions following unsuccesful operations. Patients consistently reported long-term pain, loss of sexual sensation, and psychological trauma.
In Romania, the investigation revealed an equally booming industry with parallel patterns of over-marketing, opacity, and weak oversight — including experimental procedures performed in public hospitals and regulatory commissions staffed by doctors active in the same market.

Together, these findings point to a broader European trend: intimate surgery is being commercialised faster than it is being regulated, leaving women exposed to fake science, medical harm, and systemic failures of protection.

Key Findings

  • Clinics perform high volumes of intimate surgeries, often with no evidence base and inconsistent standards.
  • Marketing uses medical-sounding language to mask cosmetic procedures and downplay risks.
  • Patients face barriers accessing their own medical documentation, contrary to Polish law.
  • Revision surgeries due to complications or aesthetic dissatisfaction are common.
  • Online platforms monetise visibility for clinicians, skewing patient choice and enabling misleading advertising.
  • The sector operates in a regulatory grey zone with little oversight or data transparency.
  • Parallel boom in Romania and Poland, with similar commercial, legal and ethical gaps.
  • A wider European trend of rapid commercialisation outpacing regulation.

Illustration by Dariana Ilie

Supported
€10,100 allocated on 22/05/2025
ID:
ECB/2025/PLUPRO/1132

Themes

Team members

Need resources for your own investigative story?

Journalismfund Europe's flexible grants programmes enable journalists to produce relevant public interest stories with a European mind-set from international, national, and regional perspectives.

Support independent cross-border investigative journalism

We rely on your support to continue the work that we do. Make a gift of any amount today.